Instead of dozens of near-useless wiki-pages that are bound to be created in its absence, this page serves as a neutral point of view location to list, categorize and briefly describe any backup software package or service that may be at least somewhat notable, but not deserving separate wikipages. In your zeal to stamp out spam, you have decimated a fairly popular page that serves a useful purpose. Along with the many external links, you deleted the associated list items. GraemeL (talk) 19:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC) Reply Actually, it is entirely inappropriate to delete half the page indiscriminately. Austin Murphy 21:45, 23 August 2006 (UTC) Reply The mass external links are entirely inappropriate for any wikipedia article. This page could possibly prevent a plethora of uninteresting stub articles about insignificant backup software packages. Other wikipages dealing with backup software should wikilink here instead of enumerating a list of packages themselves. Since these edits are being done nearly daily and there is no sign of them stopping, this page is probably the best place for them. Everyone and their brother has apparently written a backup software package and wants to register it with wikipedia. 39 Should a link to a performance comparison between five backup tools be included?įor some reason, backup software is a popular category to spam.38 Testing Opendedup as backup solution, combined with rsync for daily.35 Back-up Software kindly requesting permission to stay here in this list.34 Comparison lists currently wikilinked in the 'See also' section.
0 kommentar(er)
